1. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
  2. Centro de Ciências da Saúde
  3. DOD - Departamento de Odontologia
  4. CCS - DOD - Artigos publicados em periódicos
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/20919
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFarias Neto, Arcelino-
dc.contributor.authorCarreiro, Adriana da Fonte Porto-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-12T15:44:28Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-12T15:44:28Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationFARIAS NETO, Arcelino; CARREIRO, Adriana da Fonte Porto. Complete denture occlusion: an evidence-based approach. Journal of Prosthodontics, v. 22, n. 2, p. 94-98, 2013.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/20919-
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectBilateral balanced occlusionpt_BR
dc.subjectCanine guidancept_BR
dc.subjectConventional complete denturept_BR
dc.titleComplete denture occlusion: an evidence-based approachpt_BR
dc.typearticlept_BR
dc.description.resumoPurpose: This study involved an extensive search for randomized controlled clinical trials comparing bilateral balanced and canine-guided dentures, and questioned whether a bilateral balanced occlusion is imperative for successful denture treatment. Materials and Methods: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, LILACS, and BBD). The keywords “denture” and “occlusion” were used. The minimum inclusion requirements were (1) randomized controlled trials with patients of any age wearing both maxillary and mandibular conventional complete dentures (CDs), (2) comparison between bilateral balanced and canine-guided dentures, and (3) assessment of masticatory function and/or patients’ satisfaction. Results: The search resulted in the identification of 5166 articles. Subsequently, 5156 articles were excluded on the basis of title and abstract. By the end of the search phase, seven randomized controlled trials were considered eligible. Conclusions: Current scientific evidence suggests that bilateral balanced occlusion is not imperative for successful treatment with conventional CDs in average patients. More studies are necessary to identify if specific clinical conditions may benefit from a balanced occlusion.pt_BR
Appears in Collections:CCS - DOD - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.