A (não) assunção da responsabilidade enunciativa em narrativas das sentenças condenatórias de crimes contra a mulher

Abstract

This dissertation aims to identify, describe, analyze and interpret Commitment in court’s judgment sentencing narratives, textual discourse genre that ends a criminal case. For so, we have selected three convictions from Internet sites relating to criminal cases of murders of women who had national repercussions. Our theoretical framework is focused on studies of Textual Analysis of the Discourses (hereinafter TAD), which integrates theoretical basis of Textual Linguistics (TL) and Enunciation Linguistics. As we follow Adam's postulates (2011), we consider the text in its inextricable link with the co(n)text, the speech and academic discursive genres. For the author, “the degree of commitment of a proposition is likely to be matched by a large number of language units" (ADAM, 2011, p. 117). Likewise, present work is based on studies of Point of View (PDV), like Rabatel's (1997, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2008a, 2009, 2015, 2016), in view of relevance to the study of commitment; and Guentchéva's postulates (1994, 1996, 2011, 2014) on the manifestations of the category of mediative (MED), whose organization revolves around three fundamental values: (1) reported facts, even according to hearsay; (2) inferred facts and (3) surprising facts. In this sense, our work is guided by studies from authors Textual Linguistics, among them Koch (2004, 2005, 2012), Marcuschi (2005, 2008, 2012), Rodrigues, Passeggi and Silva Neto (2010, 2012, 2014), so as is anchored in studies of Bakhtin ([1992] 1997), about discursive genres, and investigations that focus on Legal Discourse, among which are situated Rodrigues (2016, 2016b, 2016c), Lourenço (2013), Gomes (2014 ) and Cabral (2014, 2016). In our analysis, we have brought to the fore textual-linguistic resources used by the author of each sentence, object of study as a form of manifestation commitment. Results have shown that the views of L1/E1 and E2, as well as elements of commitment , are always present in the speeches of the judges, whose enunciation is built on foundations in order to justify their decisions about crimes committed by defendants. corpus analysis revealed that construction of the PDV by the judges is carried out by linguistic mechanisms, which reveal that RE is assigned both by L1/E1, taking commitment on by propositional content or taking to itself other people's PDV, like RE is allocated to other enunciators, including defendant, victim and jury.