Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/22986
Título: Comparison of the clinical efficacy of at-home and in-office bleaching
Autor(es): Cunha, Ana Gabriela Gama
Vasconcelos, Adriana Alcantara Meira de
Borges, Boniek Castillo Dutra
Machado, Cláudia Tavares
Santos, Alex Jose Souza dos
Pinheiro, Fabio Henrique de Sá Leitão
Palavras-chave: Dentistry;Operative dentistry;Dental bleaching
Data do documento: 2011
Citação: CUNHA, A. G. G. et al. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of at home and in-office bleaching - a systematic review. International Journal of Dental Clinics, v. 3, n. 2, p. 1-4, 2011.
metadata.dc.description.resumo: Background: There is a lack of consensus regarding the superiority of the two vital bleaching methods. Aims: To compare the clinical efficacies of the two methods at home and in- office. Materials & Methods: Data was collected from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Lilacs, Scielo and BBO. Two independent researchers selected the articles, ie., only randomized clinical trials. Where there was no initial agreement, researchers reached a consensus. The search strategy initially yielded 483 titles. After the exclusion by titles, 408 articles remained and following the abstract-based evaluation, only 5 were subjected to further analysis. Results: The most of the authors did not find any statistically significant differences between at home and in-office bleaching procedures. Conclusion: Both the at home and in-office methods alone or in association are equally efficient when a 14 day protocol is used.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/22986
ISSN: 0975-8437
Aparece nas coleções:CCS - DOD - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of at home and in-office bleaching - a systematic review_2011.pdf304,98 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.