Chaves, Luciano AthaydeCunha, Heitor Freitas da2025-01-292025-01-292025-01-17CUNHA, Heitor Freitas da. Aposentadoria compulsória dos juízes e a Emenda Constitucional Nº 103/2019: penalidade administrativa ou mitigação da garantia constitucional da vitaliciedade?. Orientador: Luciano Athayde Chaves. 2025. 61 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação) - Curso de Direito, Centro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2025.https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/62264The objective of this paper is to answer the question of whether the application of compulsory retirement as an administrative penalty by the Judiciary is still compatible with the constitutional order? The methodology, with a descriptive approach, is based on the use of the hermeneutic-systematic method to interpret constitutional norms, with the support of bibliographic and documentary research. During the documentary research, a protocol was created based on the Decision Analysis Methodology (MAD), to assess possible changes in the jurisprudence in the field of sanctions applied to the judiciary, especially compulsory retirement, after Amendment No. 103/2019. The work was divided into two chapters: one to investigate the nature and legal regime applicable to judges, and another to analyze the compatibility between the constitutional provisions and the LOMAN articles that deal with the subject. The objective was divided into three specific objectives: to determine whether the punishment is present in the constitutional text, to observe whether the CNJ still applies the aforementioned administrative penalty, and to analyze whether there is a justification present in any administrative or judicial process. The results allow us to conclude that the thesis that, after the aforementioned Constitutional Amendment, the incompatibility of the application of the administrative penalty can be sustained, given the current constitutional order, is consistent, considering the principles of strict legality and practical agreement with the text of the Constitution. Nevertheless, the findings of the research indicate that the National Council of Justice continues to apply the sanction of compulsory retirement to judges.Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/MagistraturaRegime disciplinarAposentadoria compulsóriaEmenda Constitucional nº 103/2019Conselho Nacional de JustiçaJudgeshipDisciplinary rulesCompulsory retirementAmendment 103/19National Council of JusticebachelorThesisCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO CONSTITUCIONAL