Cunha, Paulo Waldemiro SoaresTeixeira, Glenda de Andrade2025-07-182025-07-182025-07-08TEIXEIRA, Glenda de Andrade. Estudo de caso: Estudo de caso: um comparativo do método quantificação de custo (MQC) por orçamentação e pelo custo unitário básico (CUB) aplicado a um imóvel urbano. 2025. 90 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Engenharia Civil) - Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2025.https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/64602This Final Undergraduate Project aims to appraise an urban property located in Tibau do Sul/RN, a tourist municipality with a growing real estate market but limited systematized data, which hampers the full application of the Direct Comparative Market Data Method (DCMDM). Therefore, the Evolutionary Method was adopted, combining the land value estimation using DCMDM with the building value quantification through the Cost Quantification Method (CQM). For the latter, two distinct approaches were applied: detailed budgeting and the Basic Unit Cost (BUC), allowing for a comparative analysis. The results showed an average difference of 41,18% between the values estimated by both methods, highlighting the influence of the chosen approach on the final valuation outcome. It is concluded that although the BUC offers greater agility, detailed budgeting provides higher accuracy, especially for properties with specific construction characteristics. The findings emphasize the importance of method selection based on the local context and contribute to both the technical enhancement and practical applicability of appraisal engineering in datascarce regions.pt-BRAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/br/Engenharia de AvaliaçõesAvaliação de ImóveisMétodo EvolutivoQuantificação de CustoCUBOrçamentaçãobachelorThesisENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL