Barros, Marcus Aurélio de FreitasMedeiros, João Lucas Araujo2022-09-232022-09-232022-07-15MEDEIROS, João Lucas Araujo, O trânsito das técnicas processuais especiais no procedimento comum: o arranjo normativo do art. 327,§2º, do código de processo civil e o papel do juiz. Orientador:Marcus Aurélio de Freitas Barros. 2022. 102f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Direito) - Departamento de Direito, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2022.https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/49427Several innovations and transformations draw attention in the Civil Procedure Code of 2015.One of them deserves a special note, it is the relationship between the common procedure and the differentiated techniques of special procedures. At this point, CPC/15 contains provisions that point to a procedural system, in which instead of maintaining the proliferation of special procedures, it seeks to create mechanisms for procedural adaptation, allowing for a greater dialogue between the common procedure and the special procedure, consolidating the possibilities flexibility and adaptation of the procedure. An example of this is the transition of techniques from the special procedure to the common procedure, something unthinkable for some time, given the concept of rigidity of the procedure. CPC/15 confirmed this flexibility through art. 327, §2 of CPC/15, which allows the cumulation of requests corresponding to different procedures, with the transit of special techniques in the common procedure. In view of this scenario, the objectives of the present work are to understand the concepts of the legal institutes relevant to the operationalization of the said article (procedure and legal technique), the characterization of the special procedure, the current relationship between common procedure and the special procedure and, at the end, define the requirements for the transit of the special technique based on art. 327, §2 of CPC/15 and the role of the judge in this context. To this goal, bibliographic and documentary research is used as a methodology, through the deductive and inductive method of approach, in order to explore concepts and present requirements for the operationalization of that article. As a result of the research, the concept of procedural legal technique is presented as the orderly predisposition of procedural expedients (rules and acts developed in the process) intended for the protection (read guardianship) of the right discussed in court. The technique can have as its object both the material law discussed (instrumental view), as well as the conservation and use of the relationship developed in the process. In addition, the current relationship between the procedures is demonstrated and at least five values are listed for operationalization of the transit of the special technique for the common procedure with fulcrum in art. 327, §2 of CPC/15, which are: the availability of the procedure, the operability of the technique, the preservation of the defendant's interests, the transit of the technique without changes and the duty of fundamentation. Finally, it is proposed the duty of the court to inform in the citation order the alteration of the rite.Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ProcedimentoProcesso CivilTécnicas de diferenciação procedimentalTrânsito de técnicas especiaisFlexibilização procedimentalProcedureBrazilian Civil ProcedureSpecial techniquesProcedural FlexibilityTransit of Special TechniquesO trânsito das técnicas processuais especiais no procedimento comum: o arranjo normativo do art. 327,§2º, do código de processo civil e o papel do juizThe transit of special procedural techniques in the common procedure: the arrangement of art. 327, §2º, of the civil procedure code and the role of the judgebachelorThesisCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO