Navegando por Autor "Segundo, Victor Hugo de Oliveira"
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Resultados por página
- Opções de Ordenação
Artigo Can people self-select an exercise intensity sufficient to enhance muscular strength during weight training? A systematic review protocol of intervention studies(Medicine, 2019) Piuvezam, Grasiela; Segundo, Victor Hugo de Oliveira; Azevedo, Kesley Pablo Morais de; Medeiros, Humberto Jefferson de; Leitão, José Carlos; Knackfuss, Maria Irany; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2343-7251Background: Previous studies have reported that self-selection of the training intensity can be an interesting strategy to improve adherence in aerobic exercise programs. However, its effectiveness with weight training has not been systematically reviewed and remains unclear. In this study, we will describe a systematic review protocol that aims to investigate if people are able to self-select an intensity during weight training sufficient to enhance muscular strength. Methods: This protocol is guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. In this study, we will search the following electronic databases: PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus. Intervention studies with at least one weight training session performed at self-selected intensity, with people from both genders and all age ranges will be included. The Downs & Black checklist will be used for methodological quality assessment. Two experienced reviewers will independently perform the selection of studies, data extraction, and evaluation of the methodological quality. Conclusion: This will be the first systematic review describing the results of weight training intervention studies with self-selected intensity. This study will provide high-quality and reliable evidence for health professionals and may direct methodological recommendations for further studiesArtigo Media and scientific communication about the COVID-19 pandemic and the repercussions on the population's mental health(Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2020-12-11) Pimenta, Isac Davidson Santiago Fernandes; Mata, Ádala Nayana de Sousa; Braga, Liliane Pereira; Medeiros, Gidyenne Christine Bandeira Silva de; Azevedo, Kesley Pablo Morais de; Bezerra, Isaac Newton Machado; Segundo, Victor Hugo de Oliveira; Nunes, Ana Clara de França; Santos, Gilberto Martins; Grosseman, Suely; Nicolás, Ismael Martínez; Piuvezam, GrasielaBackground: Good communication strategies are essential in times of crisis, such as the coronavirus pandemic. The dissemination of inaccurate information and the need for social isolation to control coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have shown a negative impact on the population, causing damage to mental health, with the appearance or worsening of symptoms of stress, fear, anxiety, and depression. Thus, the systematic review study is intended to gather evidence on the impact of information about COVID-19 on the mental health of the population. Methods: This systematic review protocol is conducted using the guidelines of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The review aims to include published studies that address the exposure of the general population to information about COVID-19, through observational and experimental studies, which consider the following outcomes: fear, stress, anxiety, and depression. Thus, a comprehensive research strategy will be conducted in the following databases: PubMed / Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Science Direct, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Two independent reviewers will perform all procedures, such as study selection, data collection, and methodological evaluation. Disagreements will be forwarded to a third reviewer. RevMan 5.3 software will be used for data analysis. Results: This systematic review will provide evidence of the influence of access to and consumption of media and scientific information about COVID-19 on the mental health of the population. It will consider information about the characterization of the study and the population studied, clinical and epidemiological information on mental health, and data on access to and consumption of media and scientific information. Discussion: The results should inform about the consequences of communication about the new coronavirus on the emergence or worsening of psychological and psychiatric symptoms, allowing to develop strategies to achieve effective communication of information to promote the mental health of the population. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42020182918 Abbreviation: COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019