Nutritional risk screening tools for older adults with COVID-19: a systematic review

Página do item simplificado Estatísticas
dc.contributor.authorLima, Severina Carla Vieira Cunha Lima
dc.contributor.authorSilva, David Franciole Oliveira Silva
dc.contributor.authorEvangelista, Karine Cavalcanti Mauricio Sena
dc.contributor.authorMarchioni, Dirce Maria
dc.contributor.authorCobucci, Ricardo Ney
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Fábia Barbosa de
dc.contributor.authorIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8268-1986pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-10T16:56:25Z
dc.date.available2025-02-10T16:56:25Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.resumoCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with high risk of malnutrition, primarily in older people; assessing nutritional risk using appropriate screening tools is critical. This systematic review identified applicable tools and assessed their measurement properties. Literature was searched in the MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS databases. Four studies conducted in China met the eligibility criteria. Sample sizes ranged from six to 182, and participants’ ages from 65 to 87 years. Seven nutritional screening and assessment tools were used: the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), the MNA-short form (MNA-sf), the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), the Geriatric NRI (GNRI), and modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically ill (mNUTRIC) score. Nutritional risk was identified in 27.5% to 100% of participants. The NRS-2002, MNA, MNA-sf, NRI, and MUST demonstrated high sensitivity; the MUST had better specificity. The MNA and MUST demonstrated better criterion validity. The MNA-sf demonstrated better predictive validity for poor appetite and weight loss; the NRS-2002 demonstrated better predictive validity for prolonged hospitalization. mNUTRIC score demonstrated good predictive validity for hospital mortality. Most instruments demonstrate high sensitivity for identifying nutritional risk, but none are acknowledged as the best for nutritional screening in older adults with COVID-19.pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationSILVA, David Franciole Oliveira; LIMA, Severina Carla Vieira Cunha; EVANGELISTA, Karine Cavalcanti Mauricio Sena; MARCHIONI, Dirce Maria; COBUCCI, Ricardo Ney; ANDRADE, Fábia Barbosa de Andrade. nutritional risk screening Tools for older adults with COVID-19: a systematic review. Nutrients, v. 12, p. 1-24, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12102956. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32992538/. Acesso em 02 dez. 2024.pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/nu12102956
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/62617
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.publisherNutrientspt_BR
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectNutritional screeningpt_BR
dc.subjectNutritional riskpt_BR
dc.subjectNutritional assessmentpt_BR
dc.subjectMalnutritionpt_BR
dc.subjectElderlypt_BR
dc.subjectCOVID-19pt_BR
dc.subjectCoronaviruspt_BR
dc.titleNutritional risk screening tools for older adults with COVID-19: a systematic reviewpt_BR
dc.typearticlept_BR

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
NutritionalRisk_Lima_2020.pdf
Tamanho:
529.62 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Baixar

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.45 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Baixar

Coleções

CCS - DNUT - Artigos publicados em periódicos
Repositório Institucional - UFRN Campus Universitário Lagoa NovaCEP 59078-970 Caixa postal 1524 Natal/RN - BrasilUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte© Copyright 2025. Todos os direitos reservados.
Contato+55 (84) 3342-2260 - R232Setor de Repositórios Digitaisrepositorio@bczm.ufrn.br
DSpaceIBICT
OasisBR
LAReferencia
Customizado pela CAT - BCZM