Quality of life assessment instruments for adults: a systematic review of population-based studies

dc.contributor.authorLima, Severina Carla Vieira Cunha
dc.contributor.authorPequeno, Nila Patrícia Freire
dc.contributor.authorCabral, Natália Louise de Araújo
dc.contributor.authorMarchioni, Dirce Maria
dc.contributor.authorLyra, Clélia de Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8268-1986pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-06T17:24:46Z
dc.date.available2025-02-06T17:24:46Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.resumoBackground: Against a backdrop of population aging and improving survival rates for chronic noncommunicable diseases (CNCD), researchers are placing growing emphasis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to identify the QoL assessment instruments used in population-based studies with adults conducted around the world. Methods: A systematic review of original research published in all languages between 2008 and 2018 was conducted. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were excluded. Results: Sixty-three articles (38.1% conducted in the Americas) fitted the eligibility criteria. Based on the AHRQ checklist for cross-sectional studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies, methodological quality was shown to be fair in the majority of studies (55.6%) and good in 44.4%. The country with the highest number of publications was Brazil (20.6%). Twelve types of generic instruments and 11 specific instruments were identified. The generic instrument SF-36 was the most frequently used measure (33.3% of studies). In-home interviewing was exclusively used by 47.6% of the studies, while 39 studies (61.9%) reported the use of self-administered questionnaires. Over two-thirds of the studies (34.9%) used questionnaires to investigate the association between chronic diseases and/or associated factors. Conclusions: It was concluded that the wide range of instruments and modes of questionnaire administration used by the studies may hinder comparisons between population groups with the same characteristics or needs. There is a lack of research on QoL and the factors affecting productive capacity. Studies of QoL in older persons should focus not only on the effects of disease and treatment, but also on the determinants of active aging and actions designed to promote it. Further research is recommended to determine which QoL instruments are best suited for population-based studies.pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationPEQUENO, Nila Patrícia Freire; CABRAL, Natália Louise de Araújo; MARCHIONI, Dirce Maria; LIMA, Severina Carla Vieira Cunha; LYRA, Clélia de Oliveira. Quality of life assessment instruments for adults: a systematic review of population-based studies. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, v. 18, p. 1, 2020. Citações:99|108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01347-7. Disponível em: https://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12955-020-01347-7. Acesso em 02 dez. 2024.pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01347-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/62547
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.publisherHealth and Quality of Life Outcomespt_BR
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectQuality of lifept_BR
dc.subjectHealth-related quality of lifept_BR
dc.subjectPopulation surveyspt_BR
dc.subjectSystematic reviewpt_BR
dc.titleQuality of life assessment instruments for adults: a systematic review of population-based studiespt_BR
dc.typearticlept_BR

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
QualityLife_Lima_2020.pdf
Tamanho:
1.25 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Baixar

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.45 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Baixar