O projeto de inovação pedagógica (PIP) e as práticas inovadoras dos professores da rede estadual do ensino médio no RN

Abstract

This study, linked to the Research Line: Education, Representations and Teacher Training, arose from the concerns about the problematic that involves the educational practices in High School in the context of the Pedagogical Innovation Project (PIP), action of the State Secretariat of Education and Culture of the RN, within the framework of the Sustainable RN Project / World Bank. The guiding question of the study prompted us to question the extent to which the Pedagogical Innovation Project (PIP) contributes to the innovative pedagogical practices of the high school teachers of the RN state network. PIP, in its first edition, has brought pedagogical innovation as a qualitative change to occur in the practice of teachers as a presupposition, which is achieved through the identification of a pedagogical problem and the innovative proposal built by the school. We identified that the contributions of PIP to the innovative pedagogical practices of high school teachers were the openness to the use of new technologies and the strengthening of teaching planning. The results of the research indicated punctual but significant experiences in the context in which they were developed, regarding the involvement and enthusiasm of the school teams applied to the planning and organization of collective and collaborative pedagogical work. The practices characterized in the study emit conclusive notes in spite of not being considered close to the one advocated by the paradigmatic rupture prescribed in the innovative pedagogical practice. Innovative practices for teachers are still rooted in a culture of innovation based on the use of technological devices that do not mobilize conscious knowledge and decision-making. These findings were based on the theoretical reference of the conceptions of pedagogical innovation and innovative pedagogical practices in: Garcia (1989); Pretto (1997); Messina and Blanco (2000); Aguerrondo and Xifra (2002); Carbonell (2002); Militrus (2002); Tedesco, (2004), Macías (2007); Muñoz and Hernandez (2008); Moreira (2008); Poggi (2011); Farias (2006). In the scope of training, a dialogue was maintained with studies carried out by Ramalho et al. (2004, 2014); Perrenoud et al. (2001); Charlot (2001); Perrenoud (2000); Imbernón, (2012), Garcia (2013), among others. This is an exploratory study based on the qualitative approach. The instrument used to collect the data was a semi-structured questionnaire with open and closed questions, as well as the six projects of the schools surveyed. The procedures used to analyze the results were obtained through the technique of Content Analysis of Bardin (1977) and Amado (2000).