Usos da meta-avaliação em estudos avaliativos da Atenção Primária à Saúde: protocolo de revisão de escopo

Abstract

Currently, there is a premise that evaluation is an indispensable tool for good governance, and although evaluations produce significant results, there must be strategies that improve their quality. The meta-assessment is the most appropriate method to verify the quality of these assessments, being able to provide evidence of points that need to be improved. This study aims to develop a protocol to carry out a scope review, allowing mapping and verifying in the literature the uses of meta-assessment in Primary Health Care. It is a scope review protocol, guided by the JBI Institute Reviewer’s Manual (JBI, 2015), guided by the PRISMA Extension for Scopong Reviews (PRSMA ScR), following the steps proposed by Arksey and O’Malley and Levac et al. The following databases will be used: Virtual Health Library (VHL); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Public Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (PubMed), Scopus and Web of Science. To identify the gray literature, international repositories will be used: DART-Europe E-Theses Portal, Open Access Scientific Repositories of Portugal (RCAAP), Electronic Theses Online Service (EThOS), National ETD Portal South African Theses and dissertations, Theses Canada – Library and Archives Canada, Catalog of Theses and Dissertations of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and Google Scholar. The stages of selection of studies will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P) having their data analyzed through thematic analysis with qualitative information. The results will be given as a narrative summary, figures and graphs.